Current:Home > NewsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -MarketStream
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-14 20:17:00
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (4718)
Related
- The 'Rebel Ridge' trailer is here: Get an exclusive first look at Netflix movie
- Tony Bennett's daughters sue their siblings, alleging they're mishandling the singer's family trust
- AI startup Perplexity wants to upend search business. News outlet Forbes says it’s ripping them off
- ‘Tis the season for swimming and bacteria alerts in lakes, rivers
- Chief beer officer for Yard House: A side gig that comes with a daily swig.
- Palestinian family recounts horror of Israel's hostage rescue raid that left a grandfather in mourning
- Court upholds law taking jurisdiction over mass transit crimes from Philly’s district attorney
- Sandy Hook families want to seize Alex Jones' social media accounts
- Beware of giant spiders: Thousands of tarantulas to emerge in 3 states for mating season
- Euro 2024 squads: Full roster for every team
Ranking
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Sandy Hook families want to seize Alex Jones' social media accounts
- U.S. customs officer accused of letting drug-filled cars enter from Mexico, spending bribe money on gifts, strip clubs
- Harry Jowsey Hints He Found His Perfect Match in Jessica Vestal
- Kourtney Kardashian Cradles 9-Month-Old Son Rocky in New Photo
- Former ICU nurse arrested on suspicion of replacing fentanyl with tap water
- Heavy rain continues flooding South Florida: See photos
- A Southwest Airlines plane that did a ‘Dutch roll’ suffered structural damage, investigators say
Recommendation
Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
Shoppers Say This Peter Thomas Roth Serum Makes Them Look Younger in 2 Days & It’s 60% off Right Now
Hawaii congressional leaders deny supporting shutdown of Red Hill oversight panel
US consumer sentiment falls for third month on concerns about persistent inflation
Michigan lawmaker who was arrested in June loses reelection bid in Republican primary
A Virginia school board restored Confederate names. Now the NAACP is suing.
Virginia city repeals ban on psychic readings as industry grows and gains more acceptance
From 'Hit Man' to 'Brats,' here are 10 movies you need to stream right now