Current:Home > FinanceKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -MarketStream
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-15 10:04:05
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Whooping cough cases are on the rise. Here's what you need to know.
- Gun violence leaves 3 towns in the South reeling
- Inmate who was beaten in back of patrol car in Arkansas has filed federal lawsuit
- Small twin
- O&C Investment Alliance: A Union of Wisdom and Love in Wealth Creation
- SEC teams gets squeezed out in latest College Football Playoff bracket projection
- Climate Week 2024 underway in New York. Here's what to know.
- Big Lots store closures could exceed 300 nationwide, discount chain reveals in filing
- American consumers are feeling less confident as concerns about jobs take center stage
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Marcellus Williams to be executed in Missouri woman's brutal murder; clemency denied
- In effort to refute porn-site message report, Mark Robinson campaign hires a law firm
- Tren de Aragua gang started in Venezuela’s prisons and now spreads fear in the US
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Major movie theater chains unveil $2.2 billion plan to improve 'cinematic experience'
- Did You Know Bath & Body Works Has a Laundry Line? Make Your Clothes Smell Like Your Fave Scent for $20
- Boeing’s ability to end a costly strike and extra FAA scrutiny looks uncertain
Recommendation
Golf's No. 1 Nelly Korda looking to regain her form – and her spot on the Olympic podium
Lady Gaga reveals surprise album and fans only have to wait until Friday for 'Harlequin'
Jimmy Kimmel shows concern (jokingly?) as Mike Tyson details training regimen
Yelloh, formerly known as Schwan's Home Delivery, permanently closing frozen food deliveries
NCAA hands former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh a 4-year show cause order for recruiting violations
Tropical Storm Helene forms; Florida bracing for major hurricane hit: Live updates
EPA data make it hard to know the extent of the contamination from last year’s Ohio derailment
You Need to See JoJo Siwa’s NSFW Cover